<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Healthcare rights and misconceptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472</link>
	<description>St Augustine is First America, founded in 1565 by Pedro Menendez, it is the oldest, continually occupied European settlement and port in the continental United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeLee</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-3#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-512</guid>
		<description>To staug2:
you said
&lt;i&gt;Personally I think instead of creating a public health plan the better way to do it is to get people without insurance (those that truely can not afford it) into a private plan that is bare bones but covers the basics. I also agree with you on needing time to sort this out but we all know that nothing this big and this important will ever get passed in an election year. Personally, I would hold off until after next year’s elections so candidates can get on record as to how they would handle this. Insurers are not completely innocent here though. They need to be taken to task for all the times where they refuse payments, force people out of hospitals before they are completely healed and other issues people have with them.&lt;/i&gt;

I agree you, however you do realize that most insurance companies have these plans, the &quot;Bare Bones&quot; plan as low as $30 - $40 a month,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To staug2:<br />
you said<br />
<i>Personally I think instead of creating a public health plan the better way to do it is to get people without insurance (those that truely can not afford it) into a private plan that is bare bones but covers the basics. I also agree with you on needing time to sort this out but we all know that nothing this big and this important will ever get passed in an election year. Personally, I would hold off until after next year’s elections so candidates can get on record as to how they would handle this. Insurers are not completely innocent here though. They need to be taken to task for all the times where they refuse payments, force people out of hospitals before they are completely healed and other issues people have with them.</i></p>
<p>I agree you, however you do realize that most insurance companies have these plans, the &#8220;Bare Bones&#8221; plan as low as $30 &#8211; $40 a month,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeLee</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-3#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-511</guid>
		<description>staug2 said:&lt;i&gt;
&quot;Personally I think instead of creating a public health plan the better way to do it is to get people without insurance (those that truely can not afford it) into a private plan that is bare bones but covers the basics. I also agree with you on needing time to sort this out but we all know that nothing this big and this important will ever get passed in an election year. Personally, I would hold off until after next year’s elections so candidates can get on record as to how they would handle this. Insurers are not completely innocent here though. They need to be taken to task for all the times where they refuse payments, force people out of hospitals before they are completely healed and other issues people have with them.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I agree with the above statement :-) The Insurers absolutely are not innocent here. 

However for the people that are not eligible for a Gov&#039;t plan, i.e. Medicaid or Medicare, there are plenty of &quot;bare bones&quot; options, many of them are even guarenteed issue. 

One &quot;bare bones&quot; plan I just looked at a major carrier for a 18 year old, 34 year old, and 50 year old  male or female  in our area is only $18.00, $27.00  and $43.00 a month and that is a guarenteed issue plan that gives them a $50.00 credit towards Dr&#039;s visits and pays 100% on diagnostic services at their specified lab and includes preventive dental and thats with a just one of the major carrier&#039;s. 

So it is a myth that there are not affordable plans out there. There are now more affordable plans than ever before in the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>staug2 said:<i><br />
&#8220;Personally I think instead of creating a public health plan the better way to do it is to get people without insurance (those that truely can not afford it) into a private plan that is bare bones but covers the basics. I also agree with you on needing time to sort this out but we all know that nothing this big and this important will ever get passed in an election year. Personally, I would hold off until after next year’s elections so candidates can get on record as to how they would handle this. Insurers are not completely innocent here though. They need to be taken to task for all the times where they refuse payments, force people out of hospitals before they are completely healed and other issues people have with them.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I agree with the above statement <img src='http://www.historiccity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  The Insurers absolutely are not innocent here. </p>
<p>However for the people that are not eligible for a Gov&#8217;t plan, i.e. Medicaid or Medicare, there are plenty of &#8220;bare bones&#8221; options, many of them are even guarenteed issue. </p>
<p>One &#8220;bare bones&#8221; plan I just looked at a major carrier for a 18 year old, 34 year old, and 50 year old  male or female  in our area is only $18.00, $27.00  and $43.00 a month and that is a guarenteed issue plan that gives them a $50.00 credit towards Dr&#8217;s visits and pays 100% on diagnostic services at their specified lab and includes preventive dental and thats with a just one of the major carrier&#8217;s. </p>
<p>So it is a myth that there are not affordable plans out there. There are now more affordable plans than ever before in the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeLee</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-3#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-510</guid>
		<description>To St. Aug,

Rassmussen Polls and Gallup Polls both say the same thing about the people happy with their health insurance, remember these are the same polls that everyone trusted just fine back before the recent election, so they are not going to trust them now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To St. Aug,</p>
<p>Rassmussen Polls and Gallup Polls both say the same thing about the people happy with their health insurance, remember these are the same polls that everyone trusted just fine back before the recent election, so they are not going to trust them now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatH</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-3#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>PatH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-509</guid>
		<description>This is way off the subject of health care...the reason I mention the $23 T debt for FY 09 is b/c that number is tied to the reason Congress is weakening on government-funded healthcare...we cannot afford any more spending.  And, you&#039;re right, the $23T is more than our GDP; included in that is the interest we are paying on the stimulus, which involves millions/day.  We&#039;ll be hearing more about that in the next month.  You are correct about the RothIRA vs standard IRA  You explained it much better and more correctly.  Glad your tax rate is so low; young families need all the breaks they can get.  You guys really are our concern (your age group) b/c we know you&#039;ll be picking up the tab for this huge debt; just one of the reasons we are totally against government-run health care.  This is all I&#039;ll have to say on this subject for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is way off the subject of health care&#8230;the reason I mention the $23 T debt for FY 09 is b/c that number is tied to the reason Congress is weakening on government-funded healthcare&#8230;we cannot afford any more spending.  And, you&#8217;re right, the $23T is more than our GDP; included in that is the interest we are paying on the stimulus, which involves millions/day.  We&#8217;ll be hearing more about that in the next month.  You are correct about the RothIRA vs standard IRA  You explained it much better and more correctly.  Glad your tax rate is so low; young families need all the breaks they can get.  You guys really are our concern (your age group) b/c we know you&#8217;ll be picking up the tab for this huge debt; just one of the reasons we are totally against government-run health care.  This is all I&#8217;ll have to say on this subject for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staug2</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>staug2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Roth IRA is taxed already.  You are thinking a standard IRA which is tax deferred, meaning you don&#039;t pay taxes when you put money in but do pay taxes when you take money out.  Roth is exactly the opposite.  You are investing after tax dollars so when you take your money out it is not taxed.  The smart move is to have a healthy balance in both so that when you retire and you want to take 50,000 out per year you can take 25k out of roth and 25k out of standard ira so you are only taxed on 25k, not 50, thereby reducing your taxes in retirement years.  The 5.3% fed tax rate was calculated by simply taking my total tax paid off my 1040 and dividing it by my total from my w2&#039;s.  I had no income from investments.  Try doing it yourself, I think you will be surprised at how low it is for the services we get from the federal gov&#039;t (mostly security, roads, education)  My marginal rates are obviously higher but overall I think my calculation is pretty sound as it takes out my deductions and credits.  You are correct I have not taken a look at the taxes I am paying on sales taxes and fees in my bills but it is not going to get me to 54% or anywhere close to that number.  As I said there is no way the bailouts/tarp/stimulus has cost 23 trillion.  That is 1.5 times the gdp of the U.S. for the entire year of 2008.  I would venture to guess the TARP money (700 billion passed last fall) will actually end up making the gov&#039;t money since when banks have paid money back it has been with interest (similar to what happened with the savings and loan bailout in the 80&#039;s).  If you are talking stimulus passed in Feb, that was 800 billion and included tax cuts and spending which even Gov. Christ has said has saved teaching/fire fighter/police jobs in Florida.  Many economists actually are saying that the stimulus should have been bigger than it actually was.  In recessions spending and tax cuts are the way the fed government can try to get us out of it.  Once the economy turns around then spending should be curtailed and the tax cuts included in the stimulus plan go away ( I think they were for 2 yrs but might be mistaken)  Honestly that was probably the biggest thing wrong in the past 8 years... President Bush rightly made tax cuts and increased spending to get us out of the 9/11 recession but once the economy recovered the tax cuts remained AND he/congress continued to increase spending.  Again though, tax policy and spending are not what I wanted to get into here and I don&#039;t want to blame this on Bush, he did some good things in office, I just think he didn&#039;t handle spending the way he should have.  I did still vote for him though :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roth IRA is taxed already.  You are thinking a standard IRA which is tax deferred, meaning you don&#8217;t pay taxes when you put money in but do pay taxes when you take money out.  Roth is exactly the opposite.  You are investing after tax dollars so when you take your money out it is not taxed.  The smart move is to have a healthy balance in both so that when you retire and you want to take 50,000 out per year you can take 25k out of roth and 25k out of standard ira so you are only taxed on 25k, not 50, thereby reducing your taxes in retirement years.  The 5.3% fed tax rate was calculated by simply taking my total tax paid off my 1040 and dividing it by my total from my w2&#8242;s.  I had no income from investments.  Try doing it yourself, I think you will be surprised at how low it is for the services we get from the federal gov&#8217;t (mostly security, roads, education)  My marginal rates are obviously higher but overall I think my calculation is pretty sound as it takes out my deductions and credits.  You are correct I have not taken a look at the taxes I am paying on sales taxes and fees in my bills but it is not going to get me to 54% or anywhere close to that number.  As I said there is no way the bailouts/tarp/stimulus has cost 23 trillion.  That is 1.5 times the gdp of the U.S. for the entire year of 2008.  I would venture to guess the TARP money (700 billion passed last fall) will actually end up making the gov&#8217;t money since when banks have paid money back it has been with interest (similar to what happened with the savings and loan bailout in the 80&#8242;s).  If you are talking stimulus passed in Feb, that was 800 billion and included tax cuts and spending which even Gov. Christ has said has saved teaching/fire fighter/police jobs in Florida.  Many economists actually are saying that the stimulus should have been bigger than it actually was.  In recessions spending and tax cuts are the way the fed government can try to get us out of it.  Once the economy turns around then spending should be curtailed and the tax cuts included in the stimulus plan go away ( I think they were for 2 yrs but might be mistaken)  Honestly that was probably the biggest thing wrong in the past 8 years&#8230; President Bush rightly made tax cuts and increased spending to get us out of the 9/11 recession but once the economy recovered the tax cuts remained AND he/congress continued to increase spending.  Again though, tax policy and spending are not what I wanted to get into here and I don&#8217;t want to blame this on Bush, he did some good things in office, I just think he didn&#8217;t handle spending the way he should have.  I did still vote for him though <img src='http://www.historiccity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatH</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>PatH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-507</guid>
		<description>If there is nothing the Administration is hiding from the American people, they should place the plan out for taxpayers to review, and let us decide, since we will be the ones paying for it.  Quit trying to ram thru a 1,000-page document, when those voting on it haven&#039;t even read it.  No one read the stimulus bill..hence, $23 trillion it&#039;s costing us just thru this FY (that&#039;s September...for 9 months).

Also, we&#039;re not talking about YOUR taxes being 54%...the discussion was the &quot;wealthy&quot; bearing the burden of the cost of this huge health insurance program.  You&#039;re very fortunate that you&#039;re able to sock money away in a Roth IRA...smart move...but, eventually, there will be taxes on that too, which is now pre-tax.  You&#039;re lucky...I don&#039;t know of ANY employed American paying only a 5.36% Federal tax rate.  How about property taxes, cable bill taxes, telephone bill taxes, internet taxes, gasoline taxes, FPA or JEA taxes, ad infinitum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is nothing the Administration is hiding from the American people, they should place the plan out for taxpayers to review, and let us decide, since we will be the ones paying for it.  Quit trying to ram thru a 1,000-page document, when those voting on it haven&#8217;t even read it.  No one read the stimulus bill..hence, $23 trillion it&#8217;s costing us just thru this FY (that&#8217;s September&#8230;for 9 months).</p>
<p>Also, we&#8217;re not talking about YOUR taxes being 54%&#8230;the discussion was the &#8220;wealthy&#8221; bearing the burden of the cost of this huge health insurance program.  You&#8217;re very fortunate that you&#8217;re able to sock money away in a Roth IRA&#8230;smart move&#8230;but, eventually, there will be taxes on that too, which is now pre-tax.  You&#8217;re lucky&#8230;I don&#8217;t know of ANY employed American paying only a 5.36% Federal tax rate.  How about property taxes, cable bill taxes, telephone bill taxes, internet taxes, gasoline taxes, FPA or JEA taxes, ad infinitum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staug2</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>staug2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I would also like to point out there is not a chance that 23 trillion dollar figure is correct in terms of the baiouts.  Considering TARP was approved for 700 Billion and some of that has not been spent while other parts have already been paid back.  Also I think the entire GDP is like 14 Trillion, the 23 Trillion number for just bailouts just can not be correct.

This is a good place for health discussions though and I look forward to reading more of your articles.  It&#039;s amazing there are so few people who are willing to blog about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to point out there is not a chance that 23 trillion dollar figure is correct in terms of the baiouts.  Considering TARP was approved for 700 Billion and some of that has not been spent while other parts have already been paid back.  Also I think the entire GDP is like 14 Trillion, the 23 Trillion number for just bailouts just can not be correct.</p>
<p>This is a good place for health discussions though and I look forward to reading more of your articles.  It&#8217;s amazing there are so few people who are willing to blog about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staug2</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>staug2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-505</guid>
		<description>The problem is you are flatly saying that private insurers will be put out of business by this.  That is not a fact, especially when we don&#039;t know what the final legislation is.  Also saying 73% are happy with their healthcare is not the same as saying they are happy with their health insurer.  These issues and the bills are still being debated by congress and until something is passed that says I don&#039;t have a choice I will take the president at his word in saying if I am happy with the insurance I have I will be able to keep it.  Personally I think instead of creating a public health plan the better way to do it is to get people without insurance (those that truely can not afford it) into a private plan that is bare bones but covers the basics.  I also agree with you on needing time to sort this out but we all know that nothing this big and this important will ever get passed in an election year.  Personally, I would hold off until after next year&#039;s elections so candidates can get on record as to how they would handle this.  Insurers are not completely innocent here though.  They need to be taken to task for all the times where they refuse payments, force people out of hospitals before they are completely healed and other issues people have with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is you are flatly saying that private insurers will be put out of business by this.  That is not a fact, especially when we don&#8217;t know what the final legislation is.  Also saying 73% are happy with their healthcare is not the same as saying they are happy with their health insurer.  These issues and the bills are still being debated by congress and until something is passed that says I don&#8217;t have a choice I will take the president at his word in saying if I am happy with the insurance I have I will be able to keep it.  Personally I think instead of creating a public health plan the better way to do it is to get people without insurance (those that truely can not afford it) into a private plan that is bare bones but covers the basics.  I also agree with you on needing time to sort this out but we all know that nothing this big and this important will ever get passed in an election year.  Personally, I would hold off until after next year&#8217;s elections so candidates can get on record as to how they would handle this.  Insurers are not completely innocent here though.  They need to be taken to task for all the times where they refuse payments, force people out of hospitals before they are completely healed and other issues people have with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeLee</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-504</guid>
		<description>I do give them credit for &quot;trying&quot; to &quot;appear&quot; as if they want to do what’s best for Americans. A couple of measures to make others compromise does not a make a successful Healthcare Bill, which granted is more than anyone else, or any party has done in a very long time. That said, any bill that ends up putting Private Insurance companies out of business rather than making them competitive is just down right unconstitutional. 

What about the 72% that are happy with their current Healthcare? To them we say &quot;oh well&quot;, sorry about your luck, its time to redistribute your Healthcare to everyone; I mean after all &quot;we have to be fair&quot;. 

You really have to ask yourself, why is President Obama acting so obsessively in driving the Congress like a team of mules to enact this Healthcare bill before they or us as Americans can read it?  Why not give us the opportunity to examine and analyze what is being proposed?  At least with &quot;Hillary Care we were allowed to do that,….oh that’s right and it DIED, didn&#039;t it? They don&#039;t want to let us read it, because then the truth will be revealed.  According to the most recent Rasmussen poll, more people now oppose this Healthcare Bill than are for it.  Even many Democrats are having severe second thoughts about this bill.  Yet, the President, once again, isn’t listening.  Our President is NOT acting very presidential by STIFLING THE DEBATE on the most important piece of legislation to be considered by our Congress in the past century!!!

When somebody hands you a contract that is over 1000 pages long do you just sign it?  Do you just believe that because they &quot;said so&quot; that it is in &quot;your best interest&quot; to sign it?  Do you not say, &quot;let me read this first&quot;?....or do you just let them say B.O.H.I.C.A. and think to yourself &quot;wow, this ones going to leave a mark&quot;. 

This legislation is going to leave an irreparable mark on America, and a mark that can never be erased, removed, or deleted. Like I said in the past,  give me one, just one, instance wherever Government took control of something and &quot;put it back on track&quot; and then gave it back us, the people, it has never ever ever happened.

AMA is only 20% 

 AMA was actually, briefly a progressive organization favoring universal health insurance, along the German model... during Progressive period, roughly 1906 to early 1920s when post-World War I red scares led to takeover by reactionary forces.  In addition, to Ronald Numbers&#039; 1978 book, Almost Persuaded: American Physicians and Compulsory Health Insurance, 1912-1920, there is an online slideshow (with great documents and cartoons) about America&#039;s 100 year fight for universal health coverage available by clicking here.  online slideshow (with great documents and cartoons) about America&#039;s 100 year fight for universal health coverage, as pointed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/pnhpnymetro-193545-century-long-struggle-health-care-pnhp-single-payer-healthcarereform-tedbrown-education-ppt-powerpoint/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; by Theodore Brown Professor of History. 

I hate to give the AMA website any traffic, but they do have the handiest and most complete listing of the specialty medical societies that most physicians do belong to and identify with, so to give the &quot;devil his due&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our-people/the-federation-medicine/national-medical-specialty-society-websites.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here it is.  &lt;/a&gt;

For the record AMA on the average makes up only 20% of the Medical Associations and they too can be &quot;bought and paid for&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do give them credit for &#8220;trying&#8221; to &#8220;appear&#8221; as if they want to do what’s best for Americans. A couple of measures to make others compromise does not a make a successful Healthcare Bill, which granted is more than anyone else, or any party has done in a very long time. That said, any bill that ends up putting Private Insurance companies out of business rather than making them competitive is just down right unconstitutional. </p>
<p>What about the 72% that are happy with their current Healthcare? To them we say &#8220;oh well&#8221;, sorry about your luck, its time to redistribute your Healthcare to everyone; I mean after all &#8220;we have to be fair&#8221;. </p>
<p>You really have to ask yourself, why is President Obama acting so obsessively in driving the Congress like a team of mules to enact this Healthcare bill before they or us as Americans can read it?  Why not give us the opportunity to examine and analyze what is being proposed?  At least with &#8220;Hillary Care we were allowed to do that,….oh that’s right and it DIED, didn&#8217;t it? They don&#8217;t want to let us read it, because then the truth will be revealed.  According to the most recent Rasmussen poll, more people now oppose this Healthcare Bill than are for it.  Even many Democrats are having severe second thoughts about this bill.  Yet, the President, once again, isn’t listening.  Our President is NOT acting very presidential by STIFLING THE DEBATE on the most important piece of legislation to be considered by our Congress in the past century!!!</p>
<p>When somebody hands you a contract that is over 1000 pages long do you just sign it?  Do you just believe that because they &#8220;said so&#8221; that it is in &#8220;your best interest&#8221; to sign it?  Do you not say, &#8220;let me read this first&#8221;?&#8230;.or do you just let them say B.O.H.I.C.A. and think to yourself &#8220;wow, this ones going to leave a mark&#8221;. </p>
<p>This legislation is going to leave an irreparable mark on America, and a mark that can never be erased, removed, or deleted. Like I said in the past,  give me one, just one, instance wherever Government took control of something and &#8220;put it back on track&#8221; and then gave it back us, the people, it has never ever ever happened.</p>
<p>AMA is only 20% </p>
<p> AMA was actually, briefly a progressive organization favoring universal health insurance, along the German model&#8230; during Progressive period, roughly 1906 to early 1920s when post-World War I red scares led to takeover by reactionary forces.  In addition, to Ronald Numbers&#8217; 1978 book, Almost Persuaded: American Physicians and Compulsory Health Insurance, 1912-1920, there is an online slideshow (with great documents and cartoons) about America&#8217;s 100 year fight for universal health coverage available by clicking here.  online slideshow (with great documents and cartoons) about America&#8217;s 100 year fight for universal health coverage, as pointed <a href="http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/pnhpnymetro-193545-century-long-struggle-health-care-pnhp-single-payer-healthcarereform-tedbrown-education-ppt-powerpoint/" rel="nofollow">here</a> by Theodore Brown Professor of History. </p>
<p>I hate to give the AMA website any traffic, but they do have the handiest and most complete listing of the specialty medical societies that most physicians do belong to and identify with, so to give the &#8220;devil his due&#8221; <a href="http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our-people/the-federation-medicine/national-medical-specialty-society-websites.shtml" rel="nofollow">here it is.  </a></p>
<p>For the record AMA on the average makes up only 20% of the Medical Associations and they too can be &#8220;bought and paid for&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staug2</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>staug2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-503</guid>
		<description>Actually I do have hard number on my taxes, especially my fed taxes which i mentioned in my note.  I paid 5.36% in fed taxes when I take my total tax charge and divide it by my totals from my w-2&#039;s.  To me that is my actual fed tax rate.  I&#039;ve got 2 kids and my wife and I make well over the average for the area.  We don&#039;t take in anything from dividends, everything is earned from our emploers.  I sincerely doubt that the rest of my taxes would end up pushing me anywhere near that 54% level.  This is why i am putting as much away as I can into a ROTH IRA.  Our taxes at this point in history lower than they will be in the future.  Tax policy is a debate for another discussion board.   My original point is that I do think we need to reform how we pay for healthcare in this country.  I agree with you in that it does not need a total overhaul but some tweeking, especially Medicare.  The costs involved are just too high and are rising too fast compared to the inflation rate.  Also to just shoot down things from our elected officials that are still in the discussion stages is not the right way to go in my opinion.  I give this congress credit for taking up this issue to begin with.  It is not easy, like BO says, that&#039;s why there hasn&#039;t been anything done on it in so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I do have hard number on my taxes, especially my fed taxes which i mentioned in my note.  I paid 5.36% in fed taxes when I take my total tax charge and divide it by my totals from my w-2&#8242;s.  To me that is my actual fed tax rate.  I&#8217;ve got 2 kids and my wife and I make well over the average for the area.  We don&#8217;t take in anything from dividends, everything is earned from our emploers.  I sincerely doubt that the rest of my taxes would end up pushing me anywhere near that 54% level.  This is why i am putting as much away as I can into a ROTH IRA.  Our taxes at this point in history lower than they will be in the future.  Tax policy is a debate for another discussion board.   My original point is that I do think we need to reform how we pay for healthcare in this country.  I agree with you in that it does not need a total overhaul but some tweeking, especially Medicare.  The costs involved are just too high and are rising too fast compared to the inflation rate.  Also to just shoot down things from our elected officials that are still in the discussion stages is not the right way to go in my opinion.  I give this congress credit for taking up this issue to begin with.  It is not easy, like BO says, that&#8217;s why there hasn&#8217;t been anything done on it in so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatH</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>PatH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Response to staug2...Obama is &quot;coming around&quot; b/c his support for health care is dwindling as the public hears more&quot; real cost numbers&quot; and his own party is defecting b/c they see danger of electability in 2010 if they go along w/this.  Take a look at Mass health care, instituted three years ago, spiraling out of control, and 37% in Mass consider it a failure...not to mention the additional billions it is costing above projections.  The $20K to $60K are the ones it&#039;s hurting the most.  And that&#039;s certainly not &quot;wealthy.&quot;  Not surprising that the AMA would endorse BO&#039;s plan, but many doctors are not part of that.  Consider Mayo Clinic, which is fighting this.  Another reason BO is &quot;coming around&quot; is that the fiscal year figures are leaking out for all the bailouts (now costing taxpayers $23 TRILLION thru September).  The Administration is trying to keep these figures silent until after the August recess, but it&#039;s not working.

The 54% (quoted by Bree) in taxes is a correct number...why should people who are productive members of society and employ many people be punished b/c of their success?  You can access Obama&#039;s tax filing this year and figure his taxes on his huge income; most of it from sale of his books.  They are only a couple percentage points behind other socialist countries in the amount of taxes they pay.  I&#039;m guessing that staug2 does not have a hard number on his/her taxes paid out.  Add up your deductions for FICA, SSA (just your portion, not considering the matching number by your employeer), property taxes, the taxes on your utilities, phone service, all items you purchase, including gas, and you may be surprised at the percentage in taxes you are paying.  If this healthcare plan is passed, and you&#039;re able to keep your possible employer-paid insurance, you will be taxed on that next year.  Right now, the 401(k) and medical and dental insurance are pre-tax but will not be for long.  Do the math...numbers don&#039;t lie. Maybe if more Americans did this, class envy would not be so prevalent.   Guess I don&#039;t get what this generation is considering okay in government.  You people are the ones who will be hurt most by this. ..and your children.  Think outside the box of Obamaism, work hard and you can be and do anything you want in America...right now.

Again, let&#039;s tweak the system, rework Medicare and cut out the fraud, eliminate LOTS of Medicaid, and talk about &quot;real&quot; numbers of uninsured.  Cut out the 11 million illegals, the 9 million who just don&#039;t wish to have it, the millions of children who don&#039;t have it b/c their parents have been irresponsible in signing up for it, and the cost will be minimal to insure the rest.  In the meantime, let the 80% of Americans who are happy with their current program, keep it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to staug2&#8230;Obama is &#8220;coming around&#8221; b/c his support for health care is dwindling as the public hears more&#8221; real cost numbers&#8221; and his own party is defecting b/c they see danger of electability in 2010 if they go along w/this.  Take a look at Mass health care, instituted three years ago, spiraling out of control, and 37% in Mass consider it a failure&#8230;not to mention the additional billions it is costing above projections.  The $20K to $60K are the ones it&#8217;s hurting the most.  And that&#8217;s certainly not &#8220;wealthy.&#8221;  Not surprising that the AMA would endorse BO&#8217;s plan, but many doctors are not part of that.  Consider Mayo Clinic, which is fighting this.  Another reason BO is &#8220;coming around&#8221; is that the fiscal year figures are leaking out for all the bailouts (now costing taxpayers $23 TRILLION thru September).  The Administration is trying to keep these figures silent until after the August recess, but it&#8217;s not working.</p>
<p>The 54% (quoted by Bree) in taxes is a correct number&#8230;why should people who are productive members of society and employ many people be punished b/c of their success?  You can access Obama&#8217;s tax filing this year and figure his taxes on his huge income; most of it from sale of his books.  They are only a couple percentage points behind other socialist countries in the amount of taxes they pay.  I&#8217;m guessing that staug2 does not have a hard number on his/her taxes paid out.  Add up your deductions for FICA, SSA (just your portion, not considering the matching number by your employeer), property taxes, the taxes on your utilities, phone service, all items you purchase, including gas, and you may be surprised at the percentage in taxes you are paying.  If this healthcare plan is passed, and you&#8217;re able to keep your possible employer-paid insurance, you will be taxed on that next year.  Right now, the 401(k) and medical and dental insurance are pre-tax but will not be for long.  Do the math&#8230;numbers don&#8217;t lie. Maybe if more Americans did this, class envy would not be so prevalent.   Guess I don&#8217;t get what this generation is considering okay in government.  You people are the ones who will be hurt most by this. ..and your children.  Think outside the box of Obamaism, work hard and you can be and do anything you want in America&#8230;right now.</p>
<p>Again, let&#8217;s tweak the system, rework Medicare and cut out the fraud, eliminate LOTS of Medicaid, and talk about &#8220;real&#8221; numbers of uninsured.  Cut out the 11 million illegals, the 9 million who just don&#8217;t wish to have it, the millions of children who don&#8217;t have it b/c their parents have been irresponsible in signing up for it, and the cost will be minimal to insure the rest.  In the meantime, let the 80% of Americans who are happy with their current program, keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staug2</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>staug2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-501</guid>
		<description>When is enough, enough?? Sad to say and I say this as respectively as possible because I do not know you so I can only call a spade a spade and that statement was a “wealth envy” statement,
So your saying that is okay to tax them 54% to pay for a very very small percentage of the population that does not have health insurance, they still have care but they don’t have “health insurance” ?

Not wealthy envy at all... All I&#039;m saying is your 54% tax level is not correct.  I would challenge you to find someone earning 1,000,000 that is paying 540,000 in Federal taxes.  It just doesn&#039;t work that way.  Most likely they have a number of generous deductions that their accountant found that would get their actual tax percentage at a MUCH lower percentage rate than that.  In regards to your comment about not doing something sooner, I&#039;m not a basher at all, but come on, don&#039;t you find it kind of suspicious that all these healthcare proposals are coming out of republicans now?  Just this morning Obama has said that the current proposals coming out of congress need some work so it seems like he is coming around to holding off on this for a bit and making sure it is correct.  You have to give him some credit for at least working with insurance companies and pham. companies to get them to agree to cost savings already.  Also I would point out that the AMA has endorsed this effort as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is enough, enough?? Sad to say and I say this as respectively as possible because I do not know you so I can only call a spade a spade and that statement was a “wealth envy” statement,<br />
So your saying that is okay to tax them 54% to pay for a very very small percentage of the population that does not have health insurance, they still have care but they don’t have “health insurance” ?</p>
<p>Not wealthy envy at all&#8230; All I&#8217;m saying is your 54% tax level is not correct.  I would challenge you to find someone earning 1,000,000 that is paying 540,000 in Federal taxes.  It just doesn&#8217;t work that way.  Most likely they have a number of generous deductions that their accountant found that would get their actual tax percentage at a MUCH lower percentage rate than that.  In regards to your comment about not doing something sooner, I&#8217;m not a basher at all, but come on, don&#8217;t you find it kind of suspicious that all these healthcare proposals are coming out of republicans now?  Just this morning Obama has said that the current proposals coming out of congress need some work so it seems like he is coming around to holding off on this for a bit and making sure it is correct.  You have to give him some credit for at least working with insurance companies and pham. companies to get them to agree to cost savings already.  Also I would point out that the AMA has endorsed this effort as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeLee</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Read all the numbers behind the numbers I just posted

http://unitedamericanteaparty.ning.com/profiles/blogs/real-numbers-of-the-real-cost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read all the numbers behind the numbers I just posted</p>
<p><a href="http://unitedamericanteaparty.ning.com/profiles/blogs/real-numbers-of-the-real-cost" rel="nofollow">http://unitedamericanteaparty.ning.com/profiles/blogs/real-numbers-of-the-real-cost</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeLee</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-2#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-499</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;THE TRUTH The real numbers behind the Healthcare Bill&lt;/B&gt;

114 million-Number of individuals who could lose their current coverage 
under the bill, according to non-partisan actuaries at the Lewin Group 

4.7 million-Number of jobs that could be lost as a result of taxes on 
businesses that cannot afford to provide health insurance coverage, 
according to a model developed by Council of Economic Advisors Chair 
Christina Romer 

$818 billion-Total new taxes on individuals who cannot afford health 
coverage, and employers who cannot afford to provide coverage that meet 
federal bureaucrats&#039; standards 

$1.28 trillion-New federal spending in the next ten years, according to a 
Congressional Budget Office score of selected elements of the bill 

.6%-Percentage of all that new spending occurring in the bill&#039;s first three 
years-representing a debt and tax &quot;time bomb&quot; in the program&#039;s later years 
that will explode for future generations 

$88,200-Definition of &quot;low-income&quot; family of four for purposes of health 
insurance subsidies 

33-Entitlement programs the bill creates, expands, or extends-an increase 
from an earlier draft 

53-Additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs, and bureaucracies the 
bill creates over and above the entitlement expansions-also an increase from 
the discussion draft &lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;N THE HISTORY OF GOV&#039;T EXPANSION, IT HAS NEVER EVER GOTTEN SMALLER, ONCE THEY HAVE THIS POWER,  THATS IT!!&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt;

1,683-Uses of the word &quot;shall,&quot; representing new duties for bureaucrats and 
mandates on individuals, businesses, and States-and an increase of 306 
mandates from the discussion draft 

$10 billion-Minimum loss sustained by taxpayers every year due to Medicare 
fraud; the &lt;b&gt;government-run health plan does not reform &lt;/b&gt;the ineffective 
anti-fraud statutes and procedures that have kept Medicare on the Government 
Accountability Office&#039;s list of high-risk programs for two decades 

Zero-Prohibitions on government programs like Medicare and Medicaid from 
using cost-effectiveness research to impose delays to or denials for access 
to life-saving treatments &lt;b&gt; &lt;i&gt;In other words, they decide if you get treatment or not&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

2017-Year Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be&lt;b&gt; exhausted-a date 
unchanged by the bill, &lt;/b&gt;which re-directs savings from Medicare to fund new 
entitlements for younger Americans 

$2,500-Promised savings for each American family from health reform, 
according to then-Senator Obama&#039;s campaign pledge-savings which the 
Congressional Budget Office has confirmed will not materialize,as the bill will not slow the growth of health care costs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>THE TRUTH The real numbers behind the Healthcare Bill</b></p>
<p>114 million-Number of individuals who could lose their current coverage<br />
under the bill, according to non-partisan actuaries at the Lewin Group </p>
<p>4.7 million-Number of jobs that could be lost as a result of taxes on<br />
businesses that cannot afford to provide health insurance coverage,<br />
according to a model developed by Council of Economic Advisors Chair<br />
Christina Romer </p>
<p>$818 billion-Total new taxes on individuals who cannot afford health<br />
coverage, and employers who cannot afford to provide coverage that meet<br />
federal bureaucrats&#8217; standards </p>
<p>$1.28 trillion-New federal spending in the next ten years, according to a<br />
Congressional Budget Office score of selected elements of the bill </p>
<p>.6%-Percentage of all that new spending occurring in the bill&#8217;s first three<br />
years-representing a debt and tax &#8220;time bomb&#8221; in the program&#8217;s later years<br />
that will explode for future generations </p>
<p>$88,200-Definition of &#8220;low-income&#8221; family of four for purposes of health<br />
insurance subsidies </p>
<p>33-Entitlement programs the bill creates, expands, or extends-an increase<br />
from an earlier draft </p>
<p>53-Additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs, and bureaucracies the<br />
bill creates over and above the entitlement expansions-also an increase from<br />
the discussion draft <b><i>N THE HISTORY OF GOV&#8217;T EXPANSION, IT HAS NEVER EVER GOTTEN SMALLER, ONCE THEY HAVE THIS POWER,  THATS IT!!</i></b></p>
<p>1,683-Uses of the word &#8220;shall,&#8221; representing new duties for bureaucrats and<br />
mandates on individuals, businesses, and States-and an increase of 306<br />
mandates from the discussion draft </p>
<p>$10 billion-Minimum loss sustained by taxpayers every year due to Medicare<br />
fraud; the <b>government-run health plan does not reform </b>the ineffective<br />
anti-fraud statutes and procedures that have kept Medicare on the Government<br />
Accountability Office&#8217;s list of high-risk programs for two decades </p>
<p>Zero-Prohibitions on government programs like Medicare and Medicaid from<br />
using cost-effectiveness research to impose delays to or denials for access<br />
to life-saving treatments <b> <i>In other words, they decide if you get treatment or not</i></b></p>
<p>2017-Year Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be<b> exhausted-a date<br />
unchanged by the bill, </b>which re-directs savings from Medicare to fund new<br />
entitlements for younger Americans </p>
<p>$2,500-Promised savings for each American family from health reform,<br />
according to then-Senator Obama&#8217;s campaign pledge-savings which the<br />
Congressional Budget Office has confirmed will not materialize,as the bill will not slow the growth of health care costs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BreeLee</title>
		<link>http://www.historiccity.com/2009/staugustine/news/florida/healthcare-rights-and-misconceptions-1472/comment-page-1#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>BreeLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiccity.com/?p=20056#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Response to staug2, 
you wrote
&lt;I&gt;&quot;If they felt so strongly about healthcare reform why didn’t they try any of their solutions when they had the votes to do something about it.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
When was that? , Why do people always go back to saying &quot;why didn&#039;t you say something sooner, why didn&#039;t you say something when bush was in office&quot;, so now that I am saying something, because I no longer will be the silent majority that makes it wrong.  It&#039;s like not keeping your car tuned up to the point it just blows up and you have to buy a new one and all you would have had to do was maintain it but you didn&#039;t, but what’s done is done, you just try to do better the next time, so yes, us the silent majority should have spoke out sooner, but I/we didn&#039;t, but it&#039;s not too late.  I do not bash Obama, I do not like many of his policies but I do not bash him, I did not like people with &quot;Bush Derangement Syndrome&quot; so I will not be one with &quot;Obama Derangement Syndrome&quot;. If I was going to do any bashing it would be the bashing of Congress, especially Pelosi, but I don&#039;t . Bashing and name calling only shows ignorance and lack of self control as well as lack of self esteem. 

Once again the system is not broken, what small part of the population that does not have health insurance, still has care, like I said lack of insurance does not mean lack of care. 

your wrote
&lt;i&gt; &quot;Most wealthy Americans pay very low actual tax rates due to the amount of deductions their high priced accountants find. This is something that ever Warren Buffet has admitted.&quot;

When is enough, enough?? Sad to say  and I say this as respectively as possible because I do not know you so I can only call a spade a spade and that statement  was a &quot;wealth envy&quot; statement, 
So your saying that is okay to tax them 54% to pay for a very very small percentage of the population that does not  have health insurance, they still have care but they don&#039;t have &quot;health insurance&quot; ?
Most of those people you are talking about raising taxes on are the Small Businesses of America, yes the ones that sign our ( or sign mine anyway),  paychecks, those people the small businesses, yes the ones that DIDN&#039;&#039;T get a bailout,. So let’s just gouge them with more taxes but lets keep bailing out the Car Companies and the Banks, that eventually just file for bankruptcy anyway. Lets reward failure and lets punish success, how much sense does that make?

You are right about Medicare, in its inception it was a great idea, but they did not project into the original statistics that people would start living longer and utilizing Medicare more. 

Which is also what the CBO is saying that no number the government has ever come up with in saying that it will cost a certain number of dollars to pay for something has ever ever ever been right, its always way under what it really always ends of costing, so this number that they are throwing out there and saying that it will &quot;cost this much&quot;, therefore saving &quot;this much&quot; is pure bogus, its a made up number to make people believe that this bill will save the government money. And then when they are asked okay &quot;how are you going to do that&quot;, they say things like Sebilius did, &quot;its a work in progress&quot;, but has no answer for any questions directed at her, she danced all over the place and all around the questions, and this is one of our great Government officials that’s going to help implement this. 

And what about this  Mandatory End of Life Counseling for Seniors  yes, page &lt;a href=&quot;http://colossus.mu.nu/archives/289833.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;416 check it out.&lt;/a&gt;. . . . woah, Nellie, . . . .  aren&#039;t Democrats supposed to be the party of &quot;choice&quot;?  I don’t know about anyone else out there, but do you want complete strangers counseling your parents and telling that they are selfish for wanting to continue to live, that they need to think about how much money they are costing the government and make them feel selfish for wanting to continue living and spending time with their children and grandchildren and great grandchildren?

 &lt;B&gt;THAT’S OUTRAGEOUS!!  COME ON D.C. ,…. READ THE BILL, WHY DO WE HAVE TO READ IT FOR YOU, THATS WHY WE PUT YOU IN OFFICE, DO YOUR JOB !!!!!!!!!&lt;/B&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to staug2,<br />
you wrote<br />
<i>&#8220;If they felt so strongly about healthcare reform why didn’t they try any of their solutions when they had the votes to do something about it.&#8221;</i><br />
When was that? , Why do people always go back to saying &#8220;why didn&#8217;t you say something sooner, why didn&#8217;t you say something when bush was in office&#8221;, so now that I am saying something, because I no longer will be the silent majority that makes it wrong.  It&#8217;s like not keeping your car tuned up to the point it just blows up and you have to buy a new one and all you would have had to do was maintain it but you didn&#8217;t, but what’s done is done, you just try to do better the next time, so yes, us the silent majority should have spoke out sooner, but I/we didn&#8217;t, but it&#8217;s not too late.  I do not bash Obama, I do not like many of his policies but I do not bash him, I did not like people with &#8220;Bush Derangement Syndrome&#8221; so I will not be one with &#8220;Obama Derangement Syndrome&#8221;. If I was going to do any bashing it would be the bashing of Congress, especially Pelosi, but I don&#8217;t . Bashing and name calling only shows ignorance and lack of self control as well as lack of self esteem. </p>
<p>Once again the system is not broken, what small part of the population that does not have health insurance, still has care, like I said lack of insurance does not mean lack of care. </p>
<p>your wrote<br />
<i> &#8220;Most wealthy Americans pay very low actual tax rates due to the amount of deductions their high priced accountants find. This is something that ever Warren Buffet has admitted.&#8221;</p>
<p>When is enough, enough?? Sad to say  and I say this as respectively as possible because I do not know you so I can only call a spade a spade and that statement  was a &#8220;wealth envy&#8221; statement,<br />
So your saying that is okay to tax them 54% to pay for a very very small percentage of the population that does not  have health insurance, they still have care but they don&#8217;t have &#8220;health insurance&#8221; ?<br />
Most of those people you are talking about raising taxes on are the Small Businesses of America, yes the ones that sign our ( or sign mine anyway),  paychecks, those people the small businesses, yes the ones that DIDN&#8221;T get a bailout,. So let’s just gouge them with more taxes but lets keep bailing out the Car Companies and the Banks, that eventually just file for bankruptcy anyway. Lets reward failure and lets punish success, how much sense does that make?</p>
<p>You are right about Medicare, in its inception it was a great idea, but they did not project into the original statistics that people would start living longer and utilizing Medicare more. </p>
<p>Which is also what the CBO is saying that no number the government has ever come up with in saying that it will cost a certain number of dollars to pay for something has ever ever ever been right, its always way under what it really always ends of costing, so this number that they are throwing out there and saying that it will &#8220;cost this much&#8221;, therefore saving &#8220;this much&#8221; is pure bogus, its a made up number to make people believe that this bill will save the government money. And then when they are asked okay &#8220;how are you going to do that&#8221;, they say things like Sebilius did, &#8220;its a work in progress&#8221;, but has no answer for any questions directed at her, she danced all over the place and all around the questions, and this is one of our great Government officials that’s going to help implement this. </p>
<p>And what about this  Mandatory End of Life Counseling for Seniors  yes, page <a href="http://colossus.mu.nu/archives/289833.php" rel="nofollow">416 check it out.</a>. . . . woah, Nellie, . . . .  aren&#8217;t Democrats supposed to be the party of &#8220;choice&#8221;?  I don’t know about anyone else out there, but do you want complete strangers counseling your parents and telling that they are selfish for wanting to continue to live, that they need to think about how much money they are costing the government and make them feel selfish for wanting to continue living and spending time with their children and grandchildren and great grandchildren?</p>
<p> <b>THAT’S OUTRAGEOUS!!  COME ON D.C. ,…. READ THE BILL, WHY DO WE HAVE TO READ IT FOR YOU, THATS WHY WE PUT YOU IN OFFICE, DO YOUR JOB !!!!!!!!!</b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

